- 2,950
- 38
- 1
Just watching the highlights on bfbs of the Everton vs QPR and am absolutely dumbfounded by his commentary as it actually bears very little resemblance to what is being shown on the screen. I know from the MOTD crowd that the defenders will usually favour the 'great tackle', whilst the forwards will go for the 'obviously a foul' decision Mr Neville's interpretation leaves me thinking he needs glasses. As a neutral there was an obvious penalty as Hoylet was fouled but according to Neville the defender got the ball, which balls he was looking at I don't know and Peinaars sending off was more down to Bosingwes dive than a poor tackle but yet again Mr N missed that as well despite his fellow commentator seeing what we saw Nev was adamant he was right and dismissed his partners observations.