Welcome to E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial Royal Air Force Rumour Network
Join our free community to unlock a range of benefits like:
  • Post and participate in discussions.
  • Send and receive private messages with other members.
  • Respond to polls and surveys.
  • Upload and share content.
  • Gain access to exclusive features and tools.
Join 7.5K others today

Has anyone seen them yet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grumpyoldb
  • Start date Start date
  • Following weeks of work, the E-GOAT team are delighted to present to you a new look to the forums with plenty of new features. Take a look around and see what you think!
G

grumpyoldb

Guest
Kate's t1ts.................................. :PDT_Xtremez_16:
 
So a cheese eating surrender monkey papperazzi took the pics with a lens akin in size to Jodrell Bank to get some grainy pics and its a scandal??

More like peeping fcuking tom to me.

I remember what happened last time the French papperazzi tried hunting down a British Royal.... :PDT_Xtremez_42:
 
Possibly next to the Beckham’s these two are quite famous..... They are in the public eye and should have kept her top on. She’s fair game for the paps, it’s her own fault.

Mr SCJ
 
Last edited:
They weren't in bloody public so why should they have to be constantly on their guard??????? They were on private property enjoying some much deserved personal time - why does that make them fair game for a disgusting money-grabbing pig?
 
So they are not allowed privacy? How would you feel if the shoe was on the other foot?

Surrender monkeys are out of order

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
 
If they had chosen to bathe like that in Public then it's a fair cop. They didn't, they were in a private area and those stupid frogs with their lax outlook just can't understand it.

I say it's bang out of order myself.
 
Ouch...touched a nerve there.

These people are probably going to be our future King and Queen FFS. You can say all you want about privacy but in 20 years these pictures will turn up once more.

Mmmmm would the gutter press headlines on coronation day read…..”Remember the Queens Nipple Slip” or words to that effect?

You would expect it from a Z listed so called TV star, but not the Royals. They should know better, even if it was on private land shot at long range.

She was rather silly…nowhere is really private.

Mr SCJ
 
I swear that most of us wouldn't even be thinking about it if the 24 hour news channels weren't concentrating on it like it was the end of time...How utterly boring, uninteresting and sad that it ended up on the Goat.
 
Last edited:
So they are not allowed privacy? How would you feel if the shoe was on the other foot?

If you mean if she was on my balcony with them out, I would feeeeel a lot better. :PDT_Xtremez_16:

My idea of privacy is behind closed doors, not out in the open in broad daylight.
You would think that the Royals would learn from previous, and recent experiences.

You wouldn't see the Queen with her paps out. Well I hope not, anyway. :PDT_Xtremez_42:
 
Did you hear the stupid Frog Bitch of an editor saying that anyone walking on the road outside the premises could have seen them? Yes they could if they had a camera lens big enough to detect microbes on Mars! Stupid frog cheese eating etc, etc.
 
It's bloody confusing is what it is! If I managed to get a photo of my neighbour's missus in their garden with her norks out for me to... er... study at my leisure, I'd have the police kicking in my door inviting me to sign the sex offenders register. But because these folk are famous it's not only allowed but the paparazzi can make money from them - how f*cked up is that?
 
From a security point of veiw:
At least it was a long lens and not a half decent sniper who could have took the future Kings head off from that range.
Who cares her sister seems to make enough out of the papers
Live by it die by it
 
He'll probably find the pic's on the crewroom wall by the time he gets back.
 
Back
Top