T55 said:Do any of you guys out there have to work for the Army on an allegedly "Joint" sqn? Do you find them incredibly inflexible and blinkered in that the only way is the Army way?
Weel said that man. I love the way the army look down on the RAF, the quote I heard to a RAF Cpl " ****ing hell mate you must be ****e if you are still a Cpl after the years you've been in". They do not realise how long it takes most folks to get through the ranks. The worst thing I saw at Basrah was a jumped up RSM coming round inspecting our tent who was freekin younger than I was adn I was a snec. They also like to shout a lot I have noticed, shout shout shout is all they can do.reddeathdrinker said:Anyone at Basrah International would agree with you there......
Yes I agree, ranks should have equivalency accross all services. I understand that the Royal Navy (any service with "Royal" in their name are good) took up the WO2 option but the RAF didn't want it. It means more pay and pensions for Flight Sergeants effectively and whilst most of them have been conned into the service to age 55 and comfy pension scenario then why pay them more? I suppose that the Army would argue that unlike the other services they cannot stay beyond 22 years unless commissioned, however, I believe this is on fitness grounds. Personnally I think that the ability to do a bit of running whilst shooting wooden targets does not make me a better or worse techie and I don't ever envisage having to shoot in anger, we do have RAF Reg after all for those dodgy moments!Silverback said:Just back from a course at the Defence School of Transport, where Jointery means teaching at the lowest level of understanding, i.e., a Private in the Royal Logistics Corps. The instructors were continually apologising to the RAF types for the speed and content of course delivery and the Army 'tradesmen' and their lack of interest or ability.
If we have to have Jointery, and unfortunately we do, then lets buy in wholesale and re-rank as WOII, Staff Sgt, L/Cpl etc and align it all.
Comments!?!?!
T55 said:Do any of you guys out there have to work for the Army on an allegedly "Joint" sqn? Do you find them incredibly inflexible and blinkered in that the only way is the Army way?
Whilst in the sandy place a few weeks ago I was speaking to a WO1 RE guy and he stated in no uncertain terms that a FS was not equivalent to a WO2 and dam all those in the RAF who think it is!!T55 said:I understand that the Royal Navy (any service with "Royal" in their name are good) took up the WO2 option but the RAF didn't want it. It means more pay and pensions for Flight Sergeants
That'll be a MACR then cos their badge looks like a WOII one doesn't itGet Tae said:He said 'show me a Flt Sgt RAF type who hold the queens warrant and I will eat my own sh1te!' so they see chf tech/flt sgt as the same as staff sgts, comments...
My experience of Staff Sgts is that they have less managerial ability than most RAF Cpls. Personally I believe the slippery slope started when the Chf Tech rank was devalued to below FS. I could go on about techies having to through 2 more ranks than everyone else and not having so much opportunity for a full career but I think that's a thread in progress elsewhere. I do feel that the RAF have let us down in not adopting the WO2 rank, if the military think jointery is the way ahead then we must have equivalent ranks. I'm sure it's all about saving money and screwing techies!Get Tae said:Whilst in the sandy place a few weeks ago I was speaking to a WO1 RE guy and he stated in no uncertain terms that a FS was not equivalent to a WO2 and dam all those in the RAF who think it is!!
He said 'show me a Flt Sgt RAF type who hold the queens warrant and I will eat my own sh1te!' so they see chf tech/flt sgt as the same as staff sgts, comments...
Lets hope they do adopt it then, that means Cpl after ten mins, Sgt after 35 mins etc etc...........T55 said:My experience of Staff Sgts is that they have less managerial ability than most RAF Cpls. Personally I believe the slippery slope started when the Chf Tech rank was devalued to below FS. I could go on about techies having to through 2 more ranks than everyone else and not having so much opportunity for a full career but I think that's a thread in progress elsewhere. I do feel that the RAF have let us down in not adopting the WO2 rank, if the military think jointery is the way ahead then we must have equivalent ranks. I'm sure it's all about saving money and screwing techies!
Get Tae said:Weel said that man. I love the way the army look down on the RAF, the quote I heard to a RAF Cpl " ****ing hell mate you must be ****e if you are still a Cpl after the years you've been in". They do not realise how long it takes most folks to get through the ranks. The worst thing I saw at Basrah was a jumped up RSM coming round inspecting our tent who was freekin younger than I was adn I was a snec. They also like to shout a lot I have noticed, shout shout shout is all they can do.
Jointery shmointery.