OK, Ive just been reading about the Sean Hodges case, the bloke who has just been released after serving 27 years and new DNA evidence proving he didnt do it.
My problem is that this man now has free licence to sue the FSS and I feel pretty pi$$ed off that this will come from the public purse.
OK the man did 27 years for something he didn't do. However, he confessed! Not even whilst under duress. He was serving another sentence at the time for theft.
The DNA technology that cleared him was not available at the time and OK fair play 10 years ago when he appealed the FSS screwed up and stated that the evidence no longer exists. But again..... the man confessed!
I just dont know what to think on this one, I can't make my mind up, so I will throw it out to the goat for opinions.
My problem is that this man now has free licence to sue the FSS and I feel pretty pi$$ed off that this will come from the public purse.
OK the man did 27 years for something he didn't do. However, he confessed! Not even whilst under duress. He was serving another sentence at the time for theft.
The DNA technology that cleared him was not available at the time and OK fair play 10 years ago when he appealed the FSS screwed up and stated that the evidence no longer exists. But again..... the man confessed!
I just dont know what to think on this one, I can't make my mind up, so I will throw it out to the goat for opinions.