Welcome to E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial Royal Air Force Rumour Network
Join our free community to unlock a range of benefits like:
  • Post and participate in discussions.
  • Send and receive private messages with other members.
  • Respond to polls and surveys.
  • Upload and share content.
  • Gain access to exclusive features and tools.
Join 7.5K others today

Private schools and the military

  • Following weeks of work, the E-GOAT team are delighted to present to you a new look to the forums with plenty of new features. Take a look around and see what you think!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48607943

An interesting read and few points paraphrased from the article.

49% of those who entered Sandhurst in January came from fee-paying schools. The Royal Navy, which saw 64% of its officer cadets entering Dartmouth, from state schools. The Royal Air Force says 35% of its officer cadets entering Cranwell College in March had previously served in the ranks and its doesn’t monitor educational background. The last Army chief of the general staff to have been taught at a state school was in the early 1950s. Yet the very top jobs in the RAF and RN have recently been given to men educated at state schools.
There is a roughly 50/50 split of schools with a Combined Cadet Forces (CCF) 194 private schools have a CCF compared to 205 state schools. So if my maths are even close around 7% of the UK population is privately educated and thterefore 50% of the CCF is drawn from 7% of the population
The Continuity of Education Allowance (CEA) is designed to give service personnel stability for their children while they move around the country or abroad. But it is officers who make the most use of it, even though they are a smaller proportion of the armed forces. Last year, 2,720 children of officers received the allowance - compared to 1,765 children of those serving in the ranks. Seems a little odd that the other ranks aren’t taking up the allowance
 
Officers very rarely stay in post longer than 2-3 years, often shorter.

Airmen can often spend 4-5 years in post - some (and I've worked with a fair few Harrier & Jag TG1 & 2 who fit this criteria) manage a whole career without changing base!
 
Officers very rarely stay in post longer than 2-3 years, often shorter. Airmen can often spend 4-5 years in post - some (and I've worked with a fair few Harrier & Jag TG1 & 2 who fit this criteria) manage a whole career without changing base!

Certainly it is true that in general officers move around more than others. Yes some of the Harrier Mafia never moved, the same could be said of the members of the Royal Yorkshire Air Force and the Scottish based Nimrod lads and lasses. But many other ranks (I hate that term) do move around on a regular basis I just find the difference in uptake surprising.
 
At Honington back in the early 80s there was a Flight Sergeant 'Rag Packer' (Squipper to you youngsters) that had been there since he was an LAC.
 
You'd be very hard pushed to get CEA as an airman these days.....
 
Why is that? If manning give you a 3-yr FAD then you remain eligible.

How many 3 year FADs do airmen get with the expectation you’ll be posted off that unit get?

I’d say not that many.

I’m not saying it’s impossible, just that it’s much harder to remain eligible than in the past.
 
I believe that it can be arranged. Child in private school, CEA claimant? You are 'marked' and you will have a 3-yr FAD wherever you go.
 
Thats not my understanding, I thought you had to re-apply and have it re-approved with no guarantee of being given a 3 yr FAD on your next posting just because you were claiming CEA. Thats just the experience of a colleague, I've never claimed it.
 
Same as you, I don't claim. But I know of people who when posted, only get a 3-yr FAD which means that they remain eligible for CEA.

Probably more to it than meets the eye.
 
Back
Top