Boarderlyne
Sergeant
- 550
- 0
- 2
Just had the WO A1 Ops Spt and WO JPA out here to enjoy a Keo or two! And they mentioned this post. Looks interesting to me. Any thoughts?
Just had the WO A1 Ops Spt and WO JPA out here to enjoy a Keo or two! And they mentioned this post. Looks interesting to me. Any thoughts?
I wish it was like an Opsman job. I ask my A1 section to run a query through JPA to get me my Sqn's NOK details so we can mail merge the results into address labels for the Welfare Packs.
They cant do it, but inundate me with loads of check sheets instead.
Bring back SAMA Opsman I say - they could run reports that actually served a purpose.
Just had the WO A1 Ops Spt and WO JPA out here to enjoy a Keo or two! And they mentioned this post. Looks interesting to me. Any thoughts?
Meeting up with the new Trade Sponsor I presume?!!
A1 Section? Who came up with that bright idea? At your place, if they're going to use such terminology surely it should be J1?
There are those who say it is just a re-branded SAMA Opsman; I think they are missing the point (although there is some similarity). Ultimately the STANEVAL NCO is responsible for your station's corner of the JPA database, making sure everyone has the correct JPA actors, that the establishment and hierarchies are correct, carrying out regular management checks and the professional standards of your fellow shineys. It is a very high profile post but is seriously hard work, especially if your WO PSF is less than supportive.
TBJ, as the guys came from the secret base in Bucks, it explains why they are A1, whereas, if the briefing had been done by our lot on-island, then of course, it would be J1
TBJ. Not a problem. Teach me to try and answer sensibly while the exploding virus has got hold of me. Nice little virus going round the island that beats the F plan into a cocked hat. Think I lost a stone yesterday morning! DT_Xtremez_42:
Loading something like this onto a SAC is not on. Most people will ignore the SAC and a goodly number would ignore a JNCO as well. Plus you would have to make sure that they are outside the chain of command as this should not be a PSF task for someone to take on in addition to their normal duties. This is being looked at to help train the non-professional JPA users as well, and that would take a fair chunk out of your year. Plus it is being considered that the STANEVAL NCO trains the brand new shinies just out of the box in order to get them up to speed on all the processes not covered during PABC and to get them through TATs with a minimum of fuss and a baseline that would be applied across the board.
Agree wholeheartedly with this. However I wonder how many units have actually done this. At my unit, the A1/Central HR section (1 x FS, 1 x Sgt, 1 x Cpl) sit in the room next to the rest of BSW Admin with no physical divide. Maybe a directive from above that the STANEVAL should be located away from all other TG17 would make their lives easier, as they could then concentrate on the task at hand.
Regrettably, two years down the line, most clerks have now got to grips with JPA and have introduced their own way of getting the job done because of a lack of direction two years ago. It will be a hard job for the STANEVAL to persuade his/her colleagues to suddenly adopt a different methodology to complete the task to the exact same end result.
At our place they had the bright idea of setting up the STANEVAL NCO (Sgt) who -together with the WO - is supposed to responsible for Quality & Standards across TG17 on the unit. Part of the remit is to drop in unannounced onto the Wgs/Sqns and ensure best practice is adopted everywhere. Sounded great until they gave her a desk in the corner of PSF. She hasn't yet been able to escape.
Originally Posted by True Blue Jack
At our place they had the bright idea of setting up the STANEVAL NCO (Sgt) who -together with the WO - is supposed to responsible for Quality & Standards across TG17 on the unit. Part of the remit is to drop in unannounced onto the Wgs/Sqns and ensure best practice is adopted everywhere. Sounded great until they gave her a desk in the corner of PSF. She hasn't yet been able to escape.
Ahh, but who defines best practice?
Typical example being the Mass Update of Public Holidays.
On a Sqn, you & I know that pretty much everyone does something together, so for Easter, we are all on leave, except for 1 or 2 who may be on guard. To that end, I could put on the PH en masse, then put the Sqn on leave en-masse. Total JPA transactions - 2. Total JPA time - 5 mins. I timed it!
A1 insist they update whole station, which includes the Sqn who are currently in the Stan. They then get a hissy on that people dont take the Grant on JPA. Well, with one Sqn permanently OOA that lot are hardly going to are they!
Despite my saying that it should be down to individual Sqns to put PHs on (for this reason - we know who is here - they dont), it falls on deaf ears.
Going back to the visit by the A1 Honchos, I trust they have been charged Food money for their time away!!!!!