U34 procedure in the JSP

[Green_garfield]

Sorry more stacker geek/porn Any idea where the procedure for the correct action of U34's is in the JSP? I've been looking everywhere for it. (the information not the JSP)I need it for a work instruction type thing I can explain it in my words but it'll be better to have the 886 reference as well.Thanks

 

[Vladic Ka]

Its in the Logistics IT Operator Manuals and User Guides right hand side when you go into the 886. Then you go into the MJDI part (also right hand side) and select poc (r1).

Internal link removed - Mono

 

[Green_garfield]

Thanks, I did find that while poking around. What I'm trying to find out is if the sqn for example doesn't do an RIE after the U34 is produced but does an RIN. should they then do RIU, RIE, DNN, GUA to clear the U34 or is the RIN enough to clear it?I don't think it is and everyone I've spoken to who knows anything agrees. but if I can find it in writing it'll help because all the operating manual saysis "If the equipment has been returned and the receipt previously input to the System, annotate the Output U34 with the Receipt Voucher number"now is this little sentence refering to RIN's? I wonder....

 

[Hades_112]

Thanks, I did find that while poking around. What I'm trying to find out is if the sqn for example doesn't do an RIE after the U34 is produced but does an RIN. should they then do RIU, RIE, DNN, GUA to clear the U34 or is the RIN enough to clear it?I don't think it is and everyone I've spoken to who knows anything agrees. but if I can find it in writing it'll help because all the operating manual saysis "If the equipment has been returned and the receipt previously input to the System, annotate the Output U34 with the Receipt Voucher number"now is this little sentence refering to RIN's? I wonder....

U34 being the process for the return of duff kit not already returned on an Exchange if my memory serves from the dim and distant past?

Oh the joys of issueing stuff to inventory holders who could not find or did not care to return stuff! Most of it turned up in the bays anyway!

 

[geekcubed]

U34 Proceedure In the JSP

U34 Proceedure In the JSP

It's in the MJDI user guide Section 6, "Progression of unsolicited outputs". This is what used to be UG 1-7. You will not find this sort of detail in the JSP any more as the policy people only wanted pure high level stuff in there (I.E. Nothing useful), so the JSP re-write caused all of the detail stuff to be either dropped, or pushed into the "User guides".


Makes being a JSP Author or Editor a doddle I presume.....

 

[441staines]

Answer

Answer

Thanks, I did find that while poking around. What I'm trying to find out is if the sqn for example doesn't do an RIE after the U34 is produced but does an RIN. should they then do RIU, RIE, DNN, GUA to clear the U34 or is the RIN enough to clear it?I don't think it is and everyone I've spoken to who knows anything agrees. but if I can find it in writing it'll help because all the operating manual saysis "If the equipment has been returned and the receipt previously input to the System, annotate the Output U34 with the Receipt Voucher number"now is this little sentence refering to RIN's? I wonder....

Clear it down with the RIN number, surely you've got better things to do tan an extra 4 transactions.

 

[Grumpyjowls]

U34 Proceedure In the JSP

U34 Proceedure In the JSP

There was a rumour some time ago that the SCCS record wasn't cleared down properly when an RIN was done rather than an RIE (R Code 5)which led to base system errors. This may have spawnwed the RIU, RIE, DNN, GUA buisness. The important thing is that the inventory is cleared and the AinU records are accurate. Of course, there are dimwits who store up problems by RIN'g then DNN'g. Worth noting that in MJDI (Release 5) the internal due in will not be removed after the 21 days. Units will receive an output U593 (effectively nagging you) and, unlike the U34, the U592 is not an auditable document. The person clearing down the nag will have their details appended to the action and therefore can be traced at a later date (especially if the return has not taken place). Big Bro and all that.....

 

[Green_garfield]

Clear it down with the RIN number, surely you've got better things to do tan an extra 4 transactions.

Dam right like being posted! haha We get U593's at the moment for land managed items, if all items are like that then it will be easier............for the guy taking over my job lol much love thanks for your input guys

 

[Schmit]

This is going to sound really geeky, but here goes anyway. You should always do a 'return as part of an exchange' to clear a U34. In the returns screen on MJDI you should use the demand number and date on the U34. MJDI will give you a message about continuing without a due and you should click yes. The dues sit invisibly on the system for ever and clog up space if you do an 'RIN'. However, more importantly is that when MJDI carries out the monthly PROV and PROC run it will see that one has been issued and returned 'U/S' and demand a stock replenishment. All those people doing RIE, DNN to prevent U34s aren't helping themselves or helping the automated stock replenishment cycle.

Again sorry for being geeky. I'll take myself round the back for a swift beating with a wet haddock