HotspurIDO
I'm not fecking BRANCH!
- 311
- 0
- 0
Wasn't sure quite where to put this post, but as it's on the subject of allowances I thought Shiney corner would probably be best. Although I haven't noticed many Shineys gracing the pages of e-goat (probably all busy JPA training?!) ...
Being a home owner, on past postings I have been able to claim refund of legal expenses for selling / buying new home. I'm now posted down south to a much more expensive area property-wise (what I get for my 3 bed detached in Lincolnshire would get me a caravan down south!). After much thought the decision was made to sell up, bank profit (for future use as house deposit when posted back up north), and move into quarters at the new posting.
Today the guy in allowances tells me I cant claim refund of expenses of selling as I'm not buying ... it's an all or nothing deal?
Somebody please tell me that this guy is confused. That would be a wholly unfair system, not only am I being forced out of home ownership but I suffer for it as well and end up out of pocket?
He did say that I have the option to rent and have rental fees paid yardy yarda .... but renting is NOT what I want to get into, it has many pitfalls that I dont want to risk (I thunk long and hard about it ... its not something Id be happy doing).
Again, if this is the case then it's just plain wrong and needs changing. A second opinion from someone more admin minded than I would be most welcome (I can only find reference to selling/buying ... not selling alone)
Thanks in advance,
Disgruntled DI
Being a home owner, on past postings I have been able to claim refund of legal expenses for selling / buying new home. I'm now posted down south to a much more expensive area property-wise (what I get for my 3 bed detached in Lincolnshire would get me a caravan down south!). After much thought the decision was made to sell up, bank profit (for future use as house deposit when posted back up north), and move into quarters at the new posting.
Today the guy in allowances tells me I cant claim refund of expenses of selling as I'm not buying ... it's an all or nothing deal?
Somebody please tell me that this guy is confused. That would be a wholly unfair system, not only am I being forced out of home ownership but I suffer for it as well and end up out of pocket?
He did say that I have the option to rent and have rental fees paid yardy yarda .... but renting is NOT what I want to get into, it has many pitfalls that I dont want to risk (I thunk long and hard about it ... its not something Id be happy doing).
Again, if this is the case then it's just plain wrong and needs changing. A second opinion from someone more admin minded than I would be most welcome (I can only find reference to selling/buying ... not selling alone)
Thanks in advance,
Disgruntled DI