Cpl-Sgt 2015

[unruly1986]

Number 1 got informed about an hour ago. Seems well chuffed. Now to start the pool go where they could go, anyone want to guess?

You still at Lossie?

 

[rugby_rules]

Apparently only 1 from TCW was lucky enough, heard there is 1 from FGW

 

[Ex Tg3]

Apparently only 1 from TCW was lucky enough, heard there is 1 from FGW

Your source is unreliable.

 

[rugby_rules]

I know for definite there is only 1 from TCW who is currently there anyway

 

[unruly1986]

Apparently only 1 from TCW was lucky enough, heard there is 1 from FGW

Know someone who was high 20s on FGW just outside new quota.

 

[4everAD]

Know someone who was high 20s on FGW just outside new quota.

I know someone as well at my place who came off in the high 20's; on the printout I saw it said he was in quota, what is the definitive answer as to the quota for this board as if it has changed the guys expectations need to be managed.

 

[rugby_rules]

Was confirmed that it was cut to 25.

 

[Rugby-Jock-Lad]

I would be more interested in the breakdown between, Ex-3, Ex-11 and new 4s myself!!!

 

[rugby_rules]

I know of atleast 2 Ex-11's in top 10

 

[ChampKind]

Was confirmed that it was cut to 25.

What is your source?

 

[Radartech]

Was confirmed that it was cut to 25.

Well that's just lovely. Because if you were a number just outside of that, but well within the initial quota of 40, you might be just a little bit annoyed ::/:

 

[rugby_rules]

What is your source?

I was informed when I was told where I had come.

It's also on the manning page.

 

[E E E E E E E E AR]

It's also on the manning page.

The number is correct, but I think you may be looking at the wrong year there, old bean.

 

[rugby_rules]

The number is correct, but I think you may be looking at the wrong year there, old bean.

Noted. It has come from HR here though as well.

 

[4everAD]

I have checked both the MOSS page with the promotion board schedules and the manning page and neither say 25, the MOSS page says 40. Disappointingly the promotions page hasn't been updated with last years promoted numbers so at first glance it would be easy to confuse last years and this and say they're looking for 25.

 

[E E E E E E E E AR]

I have checked both the MOSS page with the promotion board schedules and the manning page and neither say 25, the MOSS page says 40. Disappointingly the promotions page hasn't been updated with last years promoted numbers so at first glance it would be easy to confuse last years and this and say they're looking for 25.

It's frustrating that the Manning page hasn't been updated. Think last year's promotions have only just finished (at about 40!), so that's why it's not on there yet.

The 25 this year is coming from word of mouth. Think the A grades are being told when they're told their number.

 

[chumpzilla]

May I suggest that you check in with your HR (Chief Clerk) to check the UCAP system to give definitive answers? I am in the "Team 25" prediction for this recent board.

 

[sufferin succotash]

Cosford

Cosford

Did pretty well. 3 out of the top 6 and 5 in the top 20

 

[4everAD]

Dig some digging here and it is now confirmed (from UCAP) at 25, however when the 2 most relevant individuals here were informed a couple of days ago of there positions they were told 40 from the list released; not the best flow of information from promotion board/manning/Unit to the individuals.

 

[rugby then work]

The prediction was changed right before the board sat, so they knew it was 25. Since being ratified UCAP has always stated 25.

Congratualtions to those that scored high enough.