Dingo_Ranger
LAC
- 9
- 3
- 2
Hi Dingo, I’m going to attempt to answer a few of your points. However I’m using my phone and it’s struggle to read/post simultaneously; but here goes.
Slackers - Generally speaking, it would usually be JNCO/SNCOs who deal with this in the first instance. It’s their job and is often sorted at that level. As an EngO you may have the odd bit of paperwork cross your desk for this which comes down to Administrative Action. You’ll essential review the case and dish out the punishment (it doesn’t often get to this point).
Accountability - Mistake happen and again, JNCO/SNCOs are in place to manage the workers. They ‘should’ pick up on an individual acting out of character, from personal issues etc. This doesn’t always happen and mistakes do occur. However, this is called Human Factors (we do training on this). The supervisor (generally a Cpl) should be ensuring all work completed is to the correct standard and sign it off to say as much. There is much less ‘blame culture’ present and more effort to find out how/why errors have happened and how to mitigate them in the future. However if this impacted Air Safety then there would be a full MAA review. In 12 years I’ve not experienced an instance that has jeopardised Air Safety *touch wood*.
Your job is to make sure your SNCOs are ensuring all personnel are qualified and experienced enough to work on equipment, and provide the correct levels of supervision. It relies on trust (upwards and downwards) that everyone is fulfilling their roles.
Don’t worry about things like that, it’s part of the job and the risk is relatively low.
Thanks for the info Ell, that clears a few things up for me.
Seems the role is a little less micro-management than I expected, but that's a good thing. It's definitely better to have the JNCO/SNCO personnel deal with those matters. Not as any benefit of 'less work' for the EngO, but naturally because there's a better understanding and relationship amongst the enlisted men on the shop floor (or could be me being ignorant in that view).
Certainly sounds like a MAA review isn't something one would want to be associated with then... Though it's good that they appear so rarely, owing to things running smoothly. Naturally you have to meet someone to trust them, but I've no few would have trouble trusting the skills/judgement of a tenured SNCO.
i can say with a degree of certinty that this would not be the case, the last thing i would have wanted was a wet behind the ears JENGO with nil type experiance trying to get involved.
Mildly mannered indeed, Mr. Janitor!
The statement was more for showing the intent of getting involved with the team, though at my work place, it was definitely appreciated to operate the crane/tighten some bolts every now and then when the labor force was tapped out. Also served as a good exercise in learning to appreciate the time/difficulty of performing tasks, which was good reference when planning projects. I'm sure it's quite different in the RAF from a technical standpoint alone, i.e qualifications to even be performing tasks. Also as stated earlier in the thread, not many people (if any) are keen to have other leaning over their shoulder whilst working. As some have said though, operating a winch etc might be appreciated as an extra pair of hands, but that's obviously down to the chemistry on the shop floor.
Back in the early days of the Tornado on the Senior Bomber squadron our SENGO (a very good bloke by the way) had all the BENGOS out in the HASs working with the linies until they were competent at flight servicing ,after that they had short spells with the trade desks.
Simple but effective.
Good timing, Barch! I was just writing some replies when you posted.
I'm supportive of that methodology, for sure. Sounds like a good bloke who wanted people to appreciated the work done on the shop floor, and the time and difficulties associated with them. Not to mention building some better relationships with the linies.
Always a good way of learning what tasks are considered 'a pain' too, and let's you determine/talk out whether it's a pain because of necessity or some concocted BS. Helps in identifying the areas for improvement. (Again, could be me being naive!)