NEW JSP - thoughts

[Downsizer]

Will be putting the question why, at our ESIT next week, especially as they are withdrawing the F676 in the future. I would be spending all day raising F676's and getting nothing else done (the joys of a regt sqn!)

I raised this issue at our last one, Feb 07, just after the 886 was released...I notice that it is still in the latest edition...

PM me what they say, if you wouldn't mind..

 

[Norman the Storeman]

NtS if you are going to quote numbers at least get them right.

This mornings figure is less than fifty which shows the amount of hard work put in by the Cott staff.

You're not part of a stocktaking team are you? )

I was referring to the amount outstanding when the SSA split. Well done for getting them down to that level. DT_Xtremez_28:

 

[stacker4ever]

Norman just imagine my disappointment when, after not being here for several months, I have a look at whats been said in the supply world and there is you being all geeky and talking about u34s (whatever they are!).

I think you have let yourself down there mate.

 

[dantura]

Norman just imagine my disappointment when, after not being here for several months, I have a look at whats been said in the supply world and there is you being all geeky and talking about u34s (whatever they are!).

I think you have let yourself down there mate.

You know S4E, he's been really frightening me lately. All that talk about non-fuelly type stuff, just like a real supplier.....DT_Xtremez_09:.
I think he may have ventured that bit too far into stacker world now and it's made him all.....odd????


D

 

[Norman the Storeman]

Norman just imagine my disappointment when, after not being here for several months, I have a look at whats been said in the supply world and there is you being all geeky and talking about u34s (whatever they are!).

I think you have let yourself down there mate.

I like to keep my finger in that warm Supply pie. Mmmmm...pie!

 

[RAF Bird]

I like to keep my finger in that warm Supply pie. Mmmmm...pie!

I've heard he even has a copy of the JSP next to his bed in the mess to peruse at his leisure on them long, cold and lonely nights!!!! DT_Xtremez_35:

 

[Stax]

Norman mentions a finger in a warm Supply pie and RAFBird appears, coincidence? I think not!

 

[Robby]

NEW JSP 886 Update

NEW JSP 886 Update

Having started this thread a few months ago I am quite determined that the people in high places hear my opinion, so just two weeks ago I vented my opinions on one of the JSP 886 'managers' from Andover who was 'shocked' when I said that the current version is so 'poor'.!

I also pointed out that you can't open it in the Falklands because the Intranet is so slow to which he offered, as a solution "well it's on the Internet!" Having explained again that 33k download on either is useless and that we need a CD version, he offered a memory stick as an option, not sure if he comprehended QA or IT security!

Then the bombshell- The current locations of the old AP 830/JSP386 documents are not the final resting places for these documents - they will be moved again, maybe soon, maybe later !!!!!My top tip is not to put any references on any document just 'somewhere in the JSP 886- i'm confident no QA cell will be able to find the correct reference!

Is this a way to run a stretched, integrated, complicated, supply chain without the correctly manned Sqn's- mad as a bag of frogs! DT_Xtremez_42:

 

[Janto]

Having started this thread a few months ago I am quite determined that the people in high places hear my opinion, so just two weeks ago I vented my opinions on one of the JSP 886 'managers' from Andover who was 'shocked' when I said that the current version is so 'poor'.!

I also pointed out that you can't open it in the Falklands because the Intranet is so slow to which he offered, as a solution "well it's on the Internet!" Having explained again that 33k download on either is useless and that we need a CD version, he offered a memory stick as an option, not sure if he comprehended QA or IT security!

Then the bombshell- The current locations of the old AP 830/JSP386 documents are not the final resting places for these documents - they will be moved again, maybe soon, maybe later !!!!!My top tip is not to put any references on any document just 'somewhere in the JSP 886- i'm confident no QA cell will be able to find the correct reference!

Is this a way to run a stretched, integrated, complicated, supply chain without the correctly manned Sqn's- mad as a bag of frogs! DT_Xtremez_42:

That's me boy Robby.

I agree with your sentiment matey.

There is no lateral thinking from a non-profit making orginization.

I guess we are all doomed.

 

[Wobbly Orange]

p.s. Is the 'DL' referred to in an earlier post a short, ever-so-slightly rotund, bespectacled gentleman with a distinct Lancastrian accent and a distinct love of the Jags?

...couldn't be anyone else, but dear old 'Crasher' - was my SNCO i/C PPC Coltishall in the 80s.

p.s. ask nicely and I'll reveal the origin of 'Crasher'

 

[4mastacker]

...couldn't be anyone else, but dear old 'Crasher' - was my SNCO i/C PPC Coltishall in the 80s.

p.s. ask nicely and I'll reveal the origin of 'Crasher'

I think he might have earned that nickname before he got to Colt - his motorbike and my rhubarb wine weren't exactly a good mix.