- 4,519
- 38
- 4
Well, as stated, your mileage may vary and its only an opinion, you have to play the promotion game as you see fit. As a JT and Cpl I did have secondary duties but chose them carefully to showcase what I was about, and hopefully what the PB was looking for.
What did your 1st RO write in the secondary duty box on your F6000? If it was “no time for secondary duties, deployed to the pointy end”, then great – but what about those that did have time – like myself?
If you can stretch and showcase our guy’s abilities within the work then that obviously that has to be preferable, I am not sure this is always possible. As I said in my last post, within the 1850 characters, if you are assessing a good candidate the secondary duty really has to be a good one (and relevant) to appear in the narratives. If it isnt worthy of inclusion then it wont appear – hence my assertion that it is more important now to choose wisely. It wasn’t as important with the F6000 since there was always space to mention them within the secondary duty block.
One of my former colleagues was a JT who was into motor sport, he did OJT in the bay and was good at his job, he’d also been waiting for years for promotion. He ended up organising motor sport rallies. If you are telling me that a line such as “Jnr Tech Smith’s organisational skills are exceptional as demonstrated when he organised a successful motor-sport event with 80 competitors, 50 marshals and 3000 spectators.” isnt going to benefit the candidate then we’ll have to agree to differ. At unit level, that would be a JO role that a Jnr Tech wouldn’t get close to.
I’ve never failed any of my guys thank you. If a candidate wishes to take control of their own destiny and stretch himself and take on additional duties then good luck to them.
I agree, a supporting secondary duty can help you out a lot as an SAC(T) or JT. For example, I've done volunteer work at an aviation museum, working on various ex-military aircraft, doing stuff outside my normal trade boundary and managing and organising maintenance and fabrication projects. In my day to day role as an SAC W Tech I don't really get to do much of this, so I see it as a way of preparing me for supervisory/management engineering jobs further along the line.
What I hate, however, is the knobber who gets SIF Committee member and never turns up just because he/she thinks it might make a good assessment trinket.