Welcome to E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial Royal Air Force Rumour Network
Join our free community to unlock a range of benefits like:
  • Post and participate in discussions.
  • Send and receive private messages with other members.
  • Respond to polls and surveys.
  • Upload and share content.
  • Gain access to exclusive features and tools.
Join 7.5K others today

RAF Groundcrew left behind

  • Following weeks of work, the E-GOAT team are delighted to present to you a new look to the forums with plenty of new features. Take a look around and see what you think!
Consider though the tactical situation. The enemy are advancing at great speed. Aeroplanes are our most valuable asset. The aircrew will jump in them and fly away, yes I suspect grateful to be saving their own lives, but also those aircraft are then saved to be used in anger on another day.

Isn't this what we used to do on the old Cold War type exercises - a "Survival Scramble".

I still like to read digs at any aircrew though.
 
How about those in the a/c sticking around to defend the lads that got them in the air?:PDT_Xtremez_08:
Good point, well presented. Supposing there isn't time to arm them up though?

I think here though (and in every discussion I've ever had on this topic) we're only basing arguments on hearsay and rumour - do any of us actually know what happened in any of these alleged incidents? I sure as hell don't and I applaud Snagbuster for trying to find out.

I'm not into revisionist history though and I'm also not into judging the actions of our forbears by the standards of today.

Roverboy, I too enjoy digs at aircrew, especially a certain rotary wing loadie of my acquaintance, and so I'll wind my neck in now and let the fun continue!
 
Last edited:
...... that was why they were banned from serving UK until they were rehabilitated by them becoming one of the first Phantom squadron with the best the Fighting 54th!

6 does not equal 8! Shiney Six never were banned from serving in the UK. A certain Sentry squadron was though, by Trenchard!! So did an old Bucc sqn of naval origins, if memory serves me correct!
 
Last edited:
33sqn used to have the Crete day thing ,when aircrew would wear their hats backward and salute the ground crew.... BUT i believe they wont do it anymore because its below them!!!!!!!!! anyone from 33 like to expand on this? Was this the first and last bayonet charge by the RAF ???
 
33sqn used to have the Crete day thing ,when aircrew would wear their hats backward and salute the ground crew.... BUT i believe they wont do it anymore because its below them!!!!!!!!! anyone from 33 like to expand on this? Was this the first and last bayonet charge by the RAF ???

Been off 33 for a couple of years, but it really had degenerated into just another 'families event', subject to the usual half arsed aircrew planning and groundcrew humping, dumping and marquee erecting.

More of a chore than a pleasure for many. It has also lost a bit of tempo as we were sadly running out of veterans to invite, and many of those remaining found it harder to travel:PDT_Xtremez_08:
 
Been off 33 for a couple of years, but it really had degenerated into just another 'families event', subject to the usual half arsed aircrew planning and groundcrew humping, dumping and marquee erecting.

More of a chore than a pleasure for many. It has also lost a bit of tempo as we were sadly running out of veterans to invite, and many of those remaining found it harder to travel:PDT_Xtremez_08:

It all got emagalmated when I was on 33 at Odiham. The station was unhappy that Crete day got a better flying display than families day. We still had Crete night though. Ahhh....waking up in the middle of the airfield!
 
Well what a strange place the goat can be. Some days people reply or make comment on your posts and other times its as if only you can see what you have posted.

As to the references to 33 Sqn check here to see that lo and behold! It was mentioned on post 3! Cheers then......:PDT_Xtremez_08:
 
Well what a strange place the goat can be. Some days people reply or make comment on your posts and other times its as if only you can see what you have posted.

As to the references to 33 Sqn check here to see that lo and behold! It was mentioned on post 3! Cheers then......:PDT_Xtremez_08:

I know, but the initial question was about France so I, for one, had nothing to contribute to the topic.

maxvon then pushed the thread slightly off topic and I posted in reply to his tangent.

We weren't ignoring you MrM. It was a lovely post, the best one all day:PDT_Xtremez_27: Have a gold star and a sweetie (but don't eat it until break time).:PDT_Xtremez_15:
 
I heard 8 sqn did a bunk and left their guys behind. Now, present day 8 sqn are not allowed aeroplanes. They are "married" to 23 sqn, who "own" the E3D's, and 8 sqn supply air crew.

Possibly not the best version of events, I was told it on a course, so it must be true!!!!
 
I heard 8 sqn did a bunk and left their guys behind. Now, present day 8 sqn are not allowed aeroplanes. They are "married" to 23 sqn, who "own" the E3D's, and 8 sqn supply air crew.

Possibly not the best version of events, I was told it on a course, so it must be true!!!!

Does that mean that Shacks and Sentries aren't classified as aircraft? I though they were and 8 had did have E-3's when 23 were still flying Flickers (and 8 Sqn markings where on the one that I had a ride on during the early part of Telic).
 
Think you'll find the Sentries belong to Sentry Line Flight (or whatever they call themselves these days) and they lend them to the MT Driver (AIR) and the formation eating team in the back...... 8 Sqn were formed first and the line has never been part of it .....:raf:
 
Not quite what I've heard.... Heard from an ex-harrier sootie, they did some "abandonment".....

Yellow for the cowardess
Red for the blood that was spilled
Black for (something, forgot that one last time as well!!)

Heard the same when I was on IV at laarparts.

Black was something to do with the aircrew. Yellow was the streak of pi55 of cowardice and red the blood of the groundcrew left behind.

One of the lads who liked military history at the time did say he looked back in to IV's past and came up with that. If my memory serves me right, there was also something to do with a Queens pardon for the Squadron to be ever based back in the UK due to the cowardice.

Where he got the info from I've no idea.
 
Add 28 (AC) Sqn to your list of research subjects although I can't confirm it was definately in france at the time. The sqn colour is blue with yellow going through it. They were banished from the UK for a very long time and the reason that they were an aircrew only squadron in Hong Kong is that they weren't allowed their own groundcrew because of what happened in the past. Apparently they had to seek permission from the queen to re-form the squadron in the UK and to have groundcrew as part of the squadron.
 
Was there some sort of freindly fire thing involving 3 Sqn? it has yellow in it's badge, not sure if it needed this pardon thing. Long time since I left.
 
disgraced sqns

disgraced sqns

Key Publishing Aviation Forum has a thread of similar vein.

Somebody put the following entry.

that in the biplane days of 8 Sqn in a hot dry climate, that the groundcrew were left to the fate of the Turk forces by the aircrew. Following this incident, Lord Trenchard himself banned 8 Sqn from ever serving from the shores of England. Many years later, this caused 'questions in the house' with the advent of the Shackleton replacement, the E3D AWAC, to be based at RAF Waddington. The rest is indeed history.

Link to the pages.

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=52639&page=1

None of the colours on the crests have anything to do with leaving groundcrew behind during WW2, as the crest designs were authorized in the late 30's.
 
Andy,

20 Sqn may be worth looking at? I was part of 20 at Laarbruch long ago when they flew GR-1 Tonkas and was always told the yelow sun was there to signify the aircrew running away? Also told 20 are still not allowed back in the UK as a full Sqn - That is why they are 20(R)Sqn.
Good luck with the book!
 
33 Squadron Groundcrew on Crete

33 Squadron Groundcrew on Crete

My unit has a Force Development programme going (not started by me) and one of the SAC's has been tasked to do a presentation on a topic which the actions of 33 Sqn's groundcrew on Crete would be a good example. Does anybody off the Sqn know what they did after the aircrew and aircraft were withdrawn.
 
Back
Top