So the new policy is designed to disadvantage those posted in April/May over those posted in Feb/March then?
So the new policy is designed to disadvantage those posted in April/May over those posted in Feb/March then?
Was just thinking the same thing:
2 people both with same leave, lets say 55 days..one is posted on 15 March and the other on 15 April...
March guy arrives and nothing is done....55 days thanks very much
April guy arrives and is duly deducted 17 days leave to bring him down to 38 days...
I may be missing something because surely any decent organisation would not allow such a thing to happen....??
I standby to be corrected.
Next year on 1 Apr 12 all excess leave will be lost so start planning now.
Right, had this discussion with the Leave Policy people, who thought I was being extremely devious......
I still can't see how someone can have leave removed if they have less than 38 days. How can you prove they haven't used the ones carried over?
They won't fella. You basically have to get down to 38 days on your posting, it's only the CF leave that is lost.
Interesting to see what happens with this - I go OOA for 6 months in March, get back end of September. Take 20 days PODL so eventually get back to work around the start of November. Christmas Grant might eat about 6 days at a push so I realistically have 3 months to take 32 days leave! That is going to go down well in the workplace and I am sure I am not the only one in this position.
Another well thought out decision...
Next year on 1 Apr 12 all excess leave will be lost so start planning now.
I have just had the pleasure of reading JSP760 bit regarding this beauty.
....The opportunity to ‘stockpile’ large amounts of excess Annual Leave is to be discouraged. After 3 years or at the end of a tour, whichever is sooner, personnel are to take all untaken leave...
When did this come out?
When did this come out?