Did anyone notice the fact that Prince Andrew & some other high ranking officer could not carry out the basic movement of being able to march in step?
It must be hard to do that by yourself without a servant/aide de camp to help!!!
Well, I stood up and cheered when I saw the aircraft I had seen off this morning in the flypast.
Glad to see it made it all the way up to Londoncestershire. Now why cant they fly em for that long on a normal day without breaking it?!!DT_Xtremez_28:
And yes, the commentator seemed to be a book expert only..............
Not much mention of 1 (F) Sqn or Odihams chinooks, but then, I was flicking over channels now and again! I could have missed it.
I suppose as usual the RAF Harriers are Navy and the Chinooks are Army. It would appear the RAF doesnt really exist anymore!
Nice to see Maggie there but a great disappointment to see Des Browne there. Fecking idiot could take a few tips from Maggie about how to sort out the forces!
What was all that gumpf about the Sea Harrier the commentator was spouting? "The reason the Sea Harrier isn't taking part in todays fly past is it is a single engined aircraft & therefore unreliable, they don't want one crashing over London" or words to that effect................Where on earth do they get these people & facts?
There was a Chinook that he commented on for about 30 seconds, but i think he said that it wasnt a veteran of the war.
I seem to remember that even though most of them went down on the Atlantic Conveyer, one or two were still used during the war.
Hawk will glide reasonably well. There was at least one occassion at Boscombe Down, that I'm aware of, when one glided in from miles out. Harrier, of any mark, -engine=brick.Yep, SHAR's got canned in March 2006, The reason for no Harriers in the flypast is to do with the aircraft glide angle in the case of an engine failure as far as I can make out, Not an expert on the facts and figures on glide angles on a Hawk or a Harrier, but the Hawk is most likely a better glider than a Harrier. VC-10 was in the Falklands Operation (10 Sqn), 101 Sqn was involved in the war (Vulcan), and the VC-10 took over the AAR Role from the Victor, hence thats the link (that if the VC-10 was from 101 Sqn, I've not kept up to date on the happenings at BZN on the tanker front).
Hawk will glide reasonably well. There was at least one occassion at Boscombe Down, that I'm aware of, when one glided in from miles out. Harrier, of any mark, -engine=brick.
MAINJAFAD, just been watching one of the Falklands programmes. Question for you. Six of the Marine garrison were told to go into the hills and conduct a guerilla war, what happened to them?
MAINJAFAD, just been watching one of the Falklands programmes. Question for you. Six of the Marine garrison were told to go into the hills and conduct a guerilla war, what happened to them?
The VC10 was indeed from 101 Sqn, as they are the only VC10 Sqn left, after they ruthlessly & shamelessly absorbed & destroyed the mighty 10 Sqn.....can anyone guess which sqn I had the dubious honour of being on?DT_Xtremez_30:
Filched from Pprune hereThere was a Chinook that he commented on for about 30 seconds, but i think he said that it wasnt a veteran of the war.
I seem to remember that even though most of them went down on the Atlantic Conveyer, one or two were still used during the war.
The VC10 was indeed from 101 Sqn, as they are the only VC10 Sqn left, after they ruthlessly & shamelessly absorbed & destroyed the mighty 10 Sqn.....can anyone guess which sqn I had the dubious honour of being on?DT_Xtremez_30:
Supply Sqn, attached to 10
The VC10 was indeed from 101 Sqn, as they are the only VC10 Sqn left, after they ruthlessly & shamelessly absorbed & destroyed the mighty 10 Sqn.....can anyone guess which sqn I had the dubious honour of being on?DT_Xtremez_30:
I do believe they both became known as 10101 sqn, or Binary Sqn to those at Brize at the time, much to the annoyance of management.