- 1,183
- 48
- 50
Guess what side of the fence he's sitting on
Guess what side of the fence he's sitting on
It's true there is only so much they can blame on Westminster but they don't appear to have reached that particular blame threshold just yet. It's like a sponsored whinge-athonThey've been in power for 14 years - there's only so much they can blame on Westmonster
Are you aware that someone earning the minimum wage on full time hours earns £18,300 a year? As the Govt have determined that there is a minimum wage, do you not find it strange that the same Govt then take £1700 in tax and NI off those workers, leaving them below the minimum wage level. I'd support anyone raising the tax thresholds to minimum wage level, with higher rates of tax further up the scale to fund it.North of the border individual Tax rates are also higher - and the lovely SNP passed a motion at their conference last weekend that said anyone earning under £21,000 shouldn't pay tax. They admitted it would mean adding another 10% to middle and high earners to cover the shortfall - thankfully it's not policy (yet) it's bad enough paying higher taxes to give free shite to feckless if that comes in even the wife has said we're moving to Northumberland.
Math ????I don’t think any UK party is arguing to move the tax free allowance to Minimum or Living Wage annualised equivalent, or the NI start level.
If you remove the relative poor out of the contribution pool, do they then lose access to NHS Treatment or Pensions?
For people to value the services they receive from the state, then some form of contribution gives them skin in the game.
Oh, and by the way your math is still pretty wrong, even looking at the half dozen or so statutory wage levels, here’s some relatively positive news about the minimum wage from a bland neutral source.