Welcome to E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial Royal Air Force Rumour Network
Join our free community to unlock a range of benefits like:
  • Post and participate in discussions.
  • Send and receive private messages with other members.
  • Respond to polls and surveys.
  • Upload and share content.
  • Gain access to exclusive features and tools.
Join 7.5K others today

Higher Pay Band?

  • Following weeks of work, the E-GOAT team are delighted to present to you a new look to the forums with plenty of new features. Take a look around and see what you think!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry RAF Bird,

It alamost turned into a love-in!!!

Back to the piont, When are these so called managers going to let us know whats happening, just cos the TS and the other WO's are already in the ivory tower, bout time they looked down before they continued to p@@s on us.

What a good example of someone who knows nothing but expects everything. If your Sqn WO knew he would tell you. Bear in mind that the worst that can happen to SAC-FS is that they stay the same but the worst that can happen to the WO cadre is no pay rise for a good number of years. I guarantee that a final answer is being actively and regularly sought but adding to the rumour mill achieves nothing
 
I heard in work yesterday that a decision was made on 3 Sept, but as the Trade Sponsor has been on leave the announcement has not been made. Anyone out there know when she is back off leave? (If this is the case)
 
Well, she was present at the W.O.s conference in the middle of last month, so I would consider it highly likely that if any info was available , it would have ben disseminated there.
 
I heard in work yesterday that a decision was made on 3 Sept, but as the Trade Sponsor has been on leave the announcement has not been made. Anyone out there know when she is back off leave? (If this is the case)

12 Oct 09.

As far as I'm aware the decision was ratified at the Command Board on the 30 Sep 09.

An announcement will be soon I believe.

:PDT_Xtremez_42:
 
12 Oct 09.

As far as I'm aware the decision was ratified at the Command Board on the 30 Sep 09.

An announcement will be soon I believe.

:PDT_Xtremez_42:
i hope your right, its doing my head in now, just need clarification either way and put an end to this thread, lol
 
Pfds - paybanding?

Pfds - paybanding?

You never know, the savage cuts to PFDS may be to fund the change to the higher payband?:PDT_Xtremez_42:
 
Trade Sponsor

Trade Sponsor

We have seen a lot of bickering , especialy over the past few weeks, ref will we get this, won't we get this, why this, why that.

There are now too many rumours floating around and we can all see that a lot of people within the trade are getting miffed due to the lack of information bieng passed down.

If she reads this, i'd like to invite the trade sponsor to put her comments down on this thread, i'm sure this will stop a lot of people moaning.
 
Last edited:
We have seen a lot of bickering , especialy over the past few weeks, ref will we get this, won't we get this, why this, why that.

There are now too many rumours floating around and we can all see that a lot of people within the trade are getting miffed due to the lack of information bieng passed down.

If she reads this, i'd like to invite the trade sponsor to put her comments down on this thread, i'm sure this will stop a lot of people moaning.

Though I'm sure you understand why the trade sponsor can't put her comments down on this thread?

People moaning is one thing, a service person in a position of responsibility with a strict reporting chain to follow, giving her personal opinion on a situation that could result in large amounts of money sloshing from one places to another in order to quell some of that chinfing is, I'm sure you'd agree, quite a different matter.

Service personnel have moan since the idea of military service came about. The internet just allows a small band of people to bleat a bit more and believe that their opinion is getting 'out there'.

The trade sponsor would have to be out of her mind to comment on this thread.
 
Last edited:
Though I'm sure you understand why the trade sponsor can't put her comments down on this thread?

People moaning is one thing, a service person in a position of responsibility with a strict reporting chain to follow, giving her personal opinion on a situation that could result in large amounts of money sloshing from one places to another in order to quell some of that chinfing is, I'm sure you'd agree, quite a different matter.

Service personnel have moan since the idea of military service came about. The internet just allows a small band of people to bleat a bit more and believe that their opinion is getting 'out there'.

The trade sponsor would have to be out of her mind to comment on this thread.

Many thanks for your reply, I probably didn't explain myself properly, what I would like to see is not the facts that she already knows but a rough estimate of when the outcome will be released.
 
Last edited:
Many thanks for your reply, I probably didn't explain myself properly, what I would like to see is not the facts that she already knows but a rough estimate of when the outcome will be released.


Again surely you realise that the TS can not post that information on here??

Why dont you give her a quick bell see if she will pass the info onto you and you can post it here so the rest of us will know. :PDT_Xtremez_30:
 
Keep it civil please peeps. This is not the fight club and is a genuine debate on an important subject so lets not resort to having it moved to the Fight Club just to let it nosedive into the usual handbags.
 
Idiot

Idiot

What an idiotic post. Whith people like you in the trade it is no wonder we are unable to secure the higher payband.
 
This thread has been split.

If you wish to discuss why supply should or shouldn't be on the high payband to it here

This thread is now for the stackers to moan at each other until the decision is announced.
 
Basically what Welove 31 wrote was that again the descision has not been made as yet so we are going to just have to hurry up and wait.

WL31..... sorry for editing your post mate will speak to you laters.
 
Why has this forum gone quiet? The trade sponsor is not answering any questions via email or phone, FACT! and our trade has all but seemed to have accepted this treatment. one word ****UNACCEPTABLE****.
We deserve answers, and answers NOW.....
 
The trade sponsor sent out a e-mail to all the various supply sqn's, basically no decision until the end of the month. The people who make the decision are busy with other stuff apparently!
 
Please give us some information!

Please give us some information!

The trade sponsor sent out a e-mail to all the various supply sqn's, basically no decision until the end of the month. The people who make the decision are busy with other stuff apparently!

I hear what your saying Snowball but many of us are working in non-Supply Sqn posts and as such are sat in dark with whats going on!
When the communication subject was raised we were promised that AirSpace Log Web would be the place to find out what was going on but that is just a collection of spelling and grammar mistakes - with no current news/information and as such rapidly losing any credibility!
I'm in a similar position to the 'IPT Scales God' - working in an engineering managed environment with no Sqn WO or Sqn information flow- we rely on e-goat to tell us what's going on- pathetic just about covers it I guess!
 
The trade sponsor sent out a e-mail to all the various supply sqn's, basically no decision until the end of the month. The people who make the decision are busy with other stuff apparently!
busy with other stuff, thats pathetic, we have waited long enough its always the stackers which seem to get messed around and fobbed off, if it wasnt for the lack of prospects out there at the moment i would seriously consider my decision to stay in this job. if the trade sponsor reads this site then i would invite her to tell these "people" to pull there feckin fingers out of there hoop and tell us what the crack is
ahhhhh vented, thats better
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top