Jim_P_Pulfrew
XGE
- 931
- 16
- 0
I am loathe to jump in here as I know next to nowt about the game and its machinations, but if England are playing noughts and crosses I will always watch and support my national team.
One thing that permeates through English soccer IMHO, is misplaced expectation. Essentially, the parents expect too much of their children as mentioned, it would appear that owners now expect too much of their managers and we certainly seem to expect too much of our national side.
Look at the hard facts, we won nothing before or since 1966 and many sports historians either class that as a fluke or a rare combination of circumstance (All games played at Wembley blah di blah). Look how many stars Brazil. Italy and Germany have on their jerseys and it puts our single into some perspective.
England always seems to rely on one, possibly two, outstanding talents and build whole tournaments around them. Ted Danson misses two games at the beginning of Euro 2012, but is a straight shoe in and performs to less than he is capable of. Why? Because the nation expects him to produce genius and the manager daren't leave him on the bench because the press will take him to the cleaners based upon the expectations of the fans. Beckham breaks his toe and the game plan falls apart. Owen has a bad run of form - you know better than I other examples of people who have been expected to be awesome and failed to meet the standard.
Read back into some of the stuff written when Sir Alf left Jimmy Greaves out of the team in '66. The difference was the overpowering expectation wasn't there (We all hoped and dreamed of course) and Sir Alf didn't give a toss what was written about him either. You can posture that the players earned a lot less and weren't best mates with the foreign opposition players and were driven by desire and not lucre but that is not for me to comment on.
If I were to offer an opinion on the way ahead, don't look at what Germany et al have done, look at the models in this country. In cricket, rugby (both codes), swimming. cycling, track and field and all the others; where talent has been identified very early on, nurtured and protected from the guttersnipes in the media. Where the youngsters are driven by a desire to be the best they possibly can, not to earn bazillions and all the trouble that brings. Where coaches and referees are not threatened by pushy parents living their dream through their offspring's effort. All the sport we have been successful in have had strong resolute leaders who have taken hard decisions for the greater good of the sport and not for the mandarins at Sky and the BBC.
(I apologise in advance for invading the round ball game discussions and spouting on a subject of which I do not know much).
Jimps
One thing that permeates through English soccer IMHO, is misplaced expectation. Essentially, the parents expect too much of their children as mentioned, it would appear that owners now expect too much of their managers and we certainly seem to expect too much of our national side.
Look at the hard facts, we won nothing before or since 1966 and many sports historians either class that as a fluke or a rare combination of circumstance (All games played at Wembley blah di blah). Look how many stars Brazil. Italy and Germany have on their jerseys and it puts our single into some perspective.
England always seems to rely on one, possibly two, outstanding talents and build whole tournaments around them. Ted Danson misses two games at the beginning of Euro 2012, but is a straight shoe in and performs to less than he is capable of. Why? Because the nation expects him to produce genius and the manager daren't leave him on the bench because the press will take him to the cleaners based upon the expectations of the fans. Beckham breaks his toe and the game plan falls apart. Owen has a bad run of form - you know better than I other examples of people who have been expected to be awesome and failed to meet the standard.
Read back into some of the stuff written when Sir Alf left Jimmy Greaves out of the team in '66. The difference was the overpowering expectation wasn't there (We all hoped and dreamed of course) and Sir Alf didn't give a toss what was written about him either. You can posture that the players earned a lot less and weren't best mates with the foreign opposition players and were driven by desire and not lucre but that is not for me to comment on.
If I were to offer an opinion on the way ahead, don't look at what Germany et al have done, look at the models in this country. In cricket, rugby (both codes), swimming. cycling, track and field and all the others; where talent has been identified very early on, nurtured and protected from the guttersnipes in the media. Where the youngsters are driven by a desire to be the best they possibly can, not to earn bazillions and all the trouble that brings. Where coaches and referees are not threatened by pushy parents living their dream through their offspring's effort. All the sport we have been successful in have had strong resolute leaders who have taken hard decisions for the greater good of the sport and not for the mandarins at Sky and the BBC.
(I apologise in advance for invading the round ball game discussions and spouting on a subject of which I do not know much).
Jimps