Welcome to E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial Royal Air Force Rumour Network
Join our free community to unlock a range of benefits like:
  • Post and participate in discussions.
  • Send and receive private messages with other members.
  • Respond to polls and surveys.
  • Upload and share content.
  • Gain access to exclusive features and tools.
Join 7.5K others today

The RAF - No room for 'Guys'

  • Following weeks of work, the E-GOAT team are delighted to present to you a new look to the forums with plenty of new features. Take a look around and see what you think!
Last week WO Sara Catterall, Command Senior Enlisted Leader at NATO AIRCOM, RAF Diversity Ally & Gender Advisor (try fitting that on a name-tag) announced via Twitter that RAF personnel should refrain from using the term 'guys' when addressing groups of people (post since archived by her).

Her tweet has attracted interest and one comment in particular:

Imagine Sara’s average day at the base. Busy supervising an aircraft refuel? Er... no. Organising a bit of enthusiastic PT for the other ranks? Being RAF, definitely not. Perhaps a bit of weapons training? Ditto.

No, Sara’s day consists of sitting behind a very important desk in a very important office trying desperately to find an unhappy someone of Diversity she can be an ‘ally’ to, so that she can be seen to be fulfilling her role and to further secure her utterly pointless, but very lucrative, place on the gravy train.

Sara spends her days in her big, very important office, chewing pencils. Every time the door opens, she bolts upright and quickly shuffles papers across her important desk to look busy.

But the truth is, Sara isn’t busy. There just aren’t enough gender and diversity issues in the RAF to warrant her role, and any that do exist, will be dealt with at unit level. Sara knows this, the Head Shed know this and everyone dressed in pale blue knows this. Sara isn’t there because she is needed, or even because she has a role. No, Sara is there so that the RAF can trumpet it’s diversity credentials to the mountain tops, so that it can deflect any criticism that the Guardian might throw it’s way that there seem to be more men than women in its ranks for reasons that can only be sexist.

So Sara sits in her important office, behind her important desk chewing pencils, frantically trying to think of things to say that make her seem relevant and not just the window dressing she actually is, a sop to a media machine which itself sits chewing pencils, desperately trying to find things to write about.

But look! Sara has found something! Girls are being called ‘guys’! At last, she has something, something that will (accidentally) get in the papers. Her day-long campaign will make the RAF glow with inclusive righteousness, will make Air Vice Marshalls smile indulgently and will possibly make Sara’s very lucrative role a little safer.

But that’s this month’s story from Sara, what abomination is she going to uncover next month to justify that lovely salary? Thirty long days racking her brains trying to find offence in an organisation that is already achingly Woke.

With a sigh, in her empty, but very important office, Sara opens a drawer, pulls out another pencil and with a furrowed brow, starts chewing.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-08-22 at 07.09.52.png
    Screen Shot 2020-08-22 at 07.09.52.png
    111.2 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
cant use BAME anymore, its offensive.
What!!!! no more BAME so it's the end of Bl00dy, Armourers, Medics & Electricians, I've only just got used to it.

Seriously what new term has replaced it and who was thought to be offended?
 
What!!!! no more BAME so it's the end of Bl00dy, Armourers, Medics & Electricians, I've only just got used to it.

Seriously what new term has replaced it and who was thought to be offended?
Don't worry, we've still got LGBT.

Laser Guided Bomb Targets.
 
Sorry Talk wrench, you are a queer phobic exclusionist & need to be retrained to remember it's LGBTQ+ now......
Ahh, so now I've been labelled!

Does that put me in a minority group now and can I claim some kind of protected characteristic?
 
I have just looked up LGBTQ+ and

The Q is for Queer or Questionable.

The + means whatever they want it to mean.

Just throw an S in there somewhere for Straight, the whole spectrum is then covered and it defeats the need for the acronym altogether.
 
Many years ago at a Camp, no longer with us in Norfolk, we had a fancy dress party round our Qtr. Que 3 of the lads commonly known as the Bl**k attack all turned up in KKK get up, white robes and pillow cases, Certainly was banter working both ways there. The only shock of the night was when the Orderly Dog asked them to remove them as it was not the done thing, speechless comes to mind.
 
I've been questionable in many areas over the years...morally, hygienically and ethically. Does this mean I am on the fun bus with my rainbow brothers and sisters?
 
Interesting reading in the background of the case, the original tribunal used a section of law that suggest that the comments that she made were extreme and were tantamount to calling for all non birth gender identifying individuals to be burned at the stake.

The EAT found that her views were neither extreme nor were they calling for action so weren’t covered by that section of the law, so it has been sent back to a fresh tribunal so they can apply the right legal test.

So she’s not won her case yet, a fresh tribunal may find yet that she breached another part of the law.

It seems a shame that an NGO sees this as a failure of equality progress rather than a reasonable application of the law with a fair outcome.
 
In other news, someone had to go to court twice to state the fooking obvious:
Maybe I'm behind the curve on this one but I thought the vast majority of humans are born either blokes or Doris's. Now later on they could think they are something else but physically surely they are what the were born to be. You could be a bloke who opts for the full chop, drill, ream procedure or a Doris who puts rolled up socks in her pants but genetically you're still the same as always . I could wake up tomorrow and identify to the world as a Haddock called Maureen. I won't be able to swim faster, breathe underwater and my birth certificate won't say Maureen but in my La La land I'm Maureen and I live happily with the Lightnings on Dogger bank.

I fear the 21st century is rushing past me
 
Back
Top