gordon bennett
LAC
- 53
- 0
- 0
This was an allowance review, Flying Pay is pay!
DT_Xtremez_42:
I thought it was an allowance, otherwise it would count towards final salary for pension ?
Either way it should be scrapped DT_Xtremez_21:
This was an allowance review, Flying Pay is pay!
DT_Xtremez_42:
Nothing like I feared in fairness. Shame flying pay wasn't cut!
No mention of DS changing to non-receipt based.
Why is it a shame flying pay wasn't cut? So not only do you expect them to sh1t out as we all have on rates/HTD etc etc you want them to lose part of their pay? Nice one.
Why is it a shame flying pay wasn't cut? So not only do you expect them to sh1t out as we all have on rates/HTD etc etc you want them to lose part of their pay? Nice one.
Why is it a shame flying pay wasn't cut? So not only do you expect them to sh1t out as we all have on rates/HTD etc etc you want them to lose part of their pay? Nice one.
I think most people want to see those who are claiming flying pay but doing a desk job get flying pay removed.
For the majority it isnt too bad.
LOA is being revised, but not changed too badly.
FIA reduced by about 25%.
Boarding school allowance remains untouched.
Daily subsistance reduced slightly.
GYH private will not change for the majority
GYH public minimum distance is going up to 3 miles from 1 this year. Then up to 6 then 9 over the next two years.
Commitment bonuses reduced from 15k to 7.5k for anyone joining the mob after today (lol)
A few other minor things, nothing to write home about.
You're are correct - that statement is not true at all.
CEA has always been linked to mobility (ie it is to give children a continuity of eductation that they would not receive if they changed schools everytime their Service parent was posted). There is no link to a 2 year posting.
Manners are required to confirm that there is a likelihood that an individual will be posted further than 50 miles from their unit in the following 4 years everytime a new eligibility certificate is required.
The requirement for an automatic review of eligibilty changed in the last review. It would now be triggered if an individual hasn't moved family home as a result of 2 consecutive tours rather than the previous 3 consecutive tours.
Obviously the comparison would need to be like against like if it is to be worthwhile to it should be the ratio of officers with children of school are to ORs with children of school are who utilise this.
It's something that's awarded which has no direct comparison to cost. Petrol goes up, HTD has gone down, DS goes down yet VAT has gone up. Does it cost them any more to fly? No... so they could have shared the burden of the cuts.
I have had a quick look at the summary on the PMS website. Just a quick one for the shinney's, is GYH(T) the same as GYH(M)?
It's something that's awarded which has no direct comparison to cost. Petrol goes up, HTD has gone down, DS goes down yet VAT has gone up. Does it cost them any more to fly? No... so they could have shared the burden of the cuts.
They are sharing the burden of the cuts in losing their HTD, DS, LOA etc etc... so you actually want them to feel a larger burden just because they have a different job to you? Fair thinking that.
Why is it a shame flying pay wasn't cut? So not only do you expect them to sh1t out as we all have on rates/HTD etc etc you want them to lose part of their pay? Nice one.
They are sharing the burden of the cuts in losing their HTD, DS, LOA etc etc... so you actually want them to feel a larger burden just because they have a different job to you? Fair thinking that.
Instead of being so ready to correct my comment, maybe you should have a look at this forum and all the others and see how peeved off and let down those with their noses to the grindstone are feeling and next time you get a chance to talk to someone of influence TELL THEM!!!!
Given that those on flying pay are likely to be on a substantial salary in the first place I think it is fair that they should shoulder what I consider to be their fair share.
I think it is fair to say that comparatively they are losing out less than most OR's, after all they still get to fly and by sitting at a level higher than most people on a station are somewhat immune to the daily RAF BS.
When I was on a deployable unit I was paid LSA for the days that I was deployed, not for the fact that <could> be deployed but that I was, I can't see how it is any different for a pilot, they are either flying or they are not.