Last edited:
That is true, but the union militancy of that era has been brought under control hasn't it?
Not entirely correct, though paid sickness and leave is a legislative product, the legislation occurred after union campaigns.
The same can be said for H&S amongst others.
That is true, but the union militancy of that era has been brought under control hasn't it?
We could argue that point all day long and never agree however bearing in mind I am to the right of Ghengis Khan you're wrongDT_Xtremez_14:. My next question. Given there has not been a wholly successful resolution to any dispute through strike action in the last 30 years what (apart from raising awareness) do you think you will achieve by striking?
I heard on the news yesterday (several times actually) about the 7/7 bombing inquiry and the initial refusal of the LFB crew to go and rescue people until a copper had stood on the line to prove to them it wasnt "live".
Now call me a cynic, but bringing that up about the firemen just as they are about to strike over their busiest weekend of the year smacks of someone in the media trying to make sure that these striking firemen in London are portrayed as striking cowardly firemen.
Personally I think the firemen do a great job when called upon, but I also think they are greasy sh!ts when it comes to striking.
Ah the press! See the Daily (hate) Mail for the lies they're starting to print. Pages of vitreol, home addresses leaked by the fire brigade press department to slur members who live outside London and commute in, taking London weighting. But no mention of the issue that is the cause of the dispute. Sacking all the operational firefighters in London.
Its not about pay, though the Mail would have you believe otherwise.
Ah the press! See the Daily (hate) Mail for the lies they're starting to print. home addresses leaked by the fire brigade press department to slur members who live outside London and commute in, taking London weighting.
You're right, it's not about pay, its about pay and the numerous perks you enjoy over and above the vast majority of ther Public Sector workers. 71 day shifts, 71 night shifts 4 days off in every 8, You are not being sacked, you are being made an offer of "re-engagement" (FBU).
With 26 applicants for every job, and a whole load of unemployed people to choose from...
I say sack the effing lot of the wastrels. Complete and utter bunch of wasters. DT_Xtremez_25:
They are all so bloody sanctimonious and full of how hard their job is, and how dangerous it is. Bollox. SACK THEM ALL.
I fear I smell the whiff of burning martyr and can only hope someone crosses the picket line to put you out.
.
No one should ever cross a picket line. Scabs.
One day when you are in that big civvy world you might need these unions.
No one should ever cross a picket line. Scabs.
The next time I deploy sarcasm with a hint of irony I'll be sure to flag it.
No one should ever cross a picket line. Scabs.
One day when you are in that big civvy world you might need these unions.
I Cant understand where the papers are getting all this false info from.
I have a friend who is a fireman and he works 4 days consisiting of 10 hour days he is on call with a bleeper for the 4 nights and then have 4 days off. He works one hell of a lot of weekends and for no extra money.
Doesnt sound much of a cushy job to me?
I Cant understand where the papers are getting all this false info from.
I might not be at the office right now but I have a stack of work in front of me which has to be complete by Monday morning. I'm not asking for sympathy SB, but I'm not giving any out either, sorry.