Tuesday is D Day, got a feeling alot of my trade will be axed as well as most others, what are everyones thoughts?
Why set the LOS at 21 years then? Open it up to all SNCO's so that the board can pick the most suitable.
Totally agree,im an AV SNCO, 16 years experience,on LOS 30 and am proud to serve, personally im glad there not looking to oust my rank & trade, i want to stay in to do the job i sigend up to do, but i do agree that it does seem a little unfair as i know plenty of fellow SNEC's both AV and Mech that want out- for me i will finish my 30 years service
Because, believe it or not, a fair few SNCOs are still of the "Proud to Serve/Take it up the chuffer for the cause" ilk! By opening it up to everyone, you could end up compulsarily selecting those who look unsuitable on paper because they are newly promoted and lack the competencies of their more senior peers, yet will be the future FS/WOs because no matter what sh!t comes their way, they lap it up - in essence, exactly the kind of person the RAF wants to keep!!
So how many will jump ship because they aren't in the frame (or not selected) and won't lap it up anymore? IMO, could be a substantial number which will just reduce tranches 2 & 3.
So how many will jump ship because they aren't in the frame (or not selected) and won't lap it up anymore? IMO, could be a substantial number which will just reduce tranches 2 & 3.
Don't think you'll see anyone jump before the whole thing is done, i.e post tranche 2 & 3. Looking at SNCO's, those that have done 22+ will be straight out of the door, I know I will, even though I'm signed on for LOS 30. So the books will be balanced based on numbers required post SDSR, this will then go out of kilter as those SNCO's not selected or eligible will bang out leaving a void.
Here's one that did!DT_Xtremez_19:
Ok, fair point, what about voluntary any LOS, compulsory LOS 21 to 27? So anyone can volunteer, but if the RAF chooses you as a compulsory it will only look at LOS 21 to 27.
I've worked hard and got promoted quickly, but what I won't do is "lap it up", been messed around too many times and it's the good guys that will jump ship!
There are no voluntary redundancies, just people who volunteer to go on compulsory terms, semantics I know but there it is, again.
There are no voluntary redundancies, just people who volunteer to go on compulsory terms, semantics I know but there it is, again.
A pointless comment that adds no worth. I was simply trying to explain a scenario.
Are there any TG8 in this tranch? (fftr?